Using Response Surface Analysis to Estimate Time of The Gas-Water Contact Lift in Yamburg Gas Field Conditions
Keywords:Gas-water contact, response surface analysis, time prediction, Yamburg, gas field, lithological characteristics
Like many of the fields in northwest Siberia, the Yamburg oil and gas condensate field is in the final production stages. This, therefore, results in an accumulation of a large amount of formation water in the inflow at the bottom of the well. Response surface analysis is used as a new technique to gain a detailed understanding of the relationships between combinations of two predictor variables and an outcome variable. This approach was applied to the Yamburg field to estimate the time of the gas-water contact, considered as the result variable, by taking into account two groups of predictive variables which correspond to the reservoirs grouped by their lithological characteristics. The results of the predicted gas-water contact time were compared to the expected gas-water contact time, the data of which were taken into account for the study. Using the model parameters as well as the three-dimensional response surface, which was constructed to facilitate and improve the interpretation of the results, it was then possible to predict the gas-water contact time under certain conditions.
Chupin, Gael, Bin Hu, Tor Haugset, Jan Sagen, and Magali Claudel. "Integrated wellbore/reservoir model predicts flow transients in liquid-loaded gas wells." In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. OnePetro, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2118/110461-MS
Schiferli, W., S. P. C. Belfroid, S. Savenko, C. A. M. Veeken, and B. Hu. "Simulating liquid loading in gas wells." In 7th North American Conference on Multiphase Technology. OnePetro, 2010.
Yakupov, Rustam R., and Natalia R. Yarkeeva. "Optimization of gas wells operation at the yamburg gas field." Petroleum Engineering 16, no. 3: (2018): 41-49. https://doi.org/10.17122/ngdelo-2018-3-41-49
Alexandrovich, Legkoonets Vladislav, Mardashov Dmitry Vladimirovich, and Morozov Alexander Viktorovich. "Water shut-off treatment efficiency forecasting in the context of yamburgskoe oil-gas condensate field." PRONEFT. Professionally About Oil 3, no. 9 (2018): 51-55. https://doi.org/10.24887/2587-7399-2018-3-51-55
Vniigaz, Gazprom. "Development and estimation of methods of local grinding of the hydrodynamic model depending on the detaility of the initial geological model." Research Institute of Natural Gases and Gas Technologies – VNIIGAZ. Moscow, 2005.
Gaidukova, A. A. "Geological structure and state of development of the Cenomanian deposits of the Yamburgskoye oil and gas condensate field." Journals of Higher Educational Institutions Oil And Gas 4 (2009): 13-19.
Kontorovich, V. A., S. Y. Belyaev, A. E. Kontorovich, V. O. Krasavchikov, A. A. Kontorovich, and O. I. Suprunenko. "Tectonic structure and history of the development of the West Siberian geosyneclise in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic." Geologiya i Geofizika 42, no. 11-12 (2001): 1832-1845.
Kurkin, A. A. "Clarification of the prospects for oil and gas content in the east of Yamal based on a detailed model of geological development." Industrial University of Tyumen, 2019.
Drozdov, A. N., J. B. Mugisho, E. I. Gorelkina, Y. A. Gorbyleva, V. B. Ludupov, and V. D. Volkov. "A New Technical Solution for Liquid Removal from Flooded Gas and Gas Condensate Wells." Territorija "NEFTEGAS" [Oil and Gas Territory] no. 1-2 (2021): 56-62.
Mugisho, J. B., and N. A. Mirsamiev. "Calculation of the Minimum Required Flow Rates for Water Removal from Flooded Wells under the Conditions of the Yamburgskoye Field." In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 666, no. 6, p. 062013. IOP Publishing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/666/6/062013
Nair, Abhilash T., Abhipsa R. Makwana, and M. Mansoor Ahammed. "The use of response surface methodology for modelling and analysis of water and wastewater treatment processes: a review." Water Science and Technology 69, no. 3 (2014): 464-478. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.733
Alman-Abad, Zahra Sheikhi, Hossein Pirkharrati, Farrokh Asadzadeh, and Mahdi Maleki-Kakelar. "Application of response surface methodology for optimization of zinc elimination from a polluted soil using tartaric acid." Adsorption Science & Technology 38, no. 3-4 (2020): 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263617420916592
Musa, Sabariah, Ng Le Bin, Adel Ali Saeed Abduh Algheethi, Nor Azazi Zakaria, and Lau Tze Liang. "Groundwater Analysis for Unconfined and Clayey Layer by using Response Surface Methodology." Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 69, no. 2 (2020): 168-176. https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.69.2.168176
Yu, Jianjun, Xiaosheng Qin, Ole Larsen, and Lloyd Hock Chye Chua. "Comparison between response surface models and artificial neural networks in hydrologic forecasting." Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 19, no. 3 (2014): 473-481. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000827
Kuczera, George. "Assessing hydrologic model nonlinearity using response surface plots." Journal of Hydrology 118, no. 1-4 (1990): 143-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(90)90255-V
Song, LaiFu, Xiang Yu, Bin Xu, Rui Pang, and ZeYu Zhang. "3D slope reliability analysis based on the intelligent response surface methodology." Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 80, no. 2 (2021): 735-749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01940-6
Slotte, Per Arne, and Eivind Smorgrav. "Response surface methodology approach for history matching and uncertainty assessment of reservoir simulation models." In Europec/EAGE Conference and Exhibition. OnePetro, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2118/113390-MS
Rohmer, Jeremy, and Olivier Bouc. "A response surface methodology to address uncertainties in cap rock failure assessment for CO2 geological storage in deep aquifers." International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 4, no. 2 (2010): 198-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.12.001
Rahman, Musfika, and Iskandar Dzulkarnain. "Response Surface Method for Modelling the Effect of CO2 in Brine/Waxy Oil Interfacial Tension during LSW-WAG Enhanced Oil Recovery." Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology 22, no. 1 (2021): 54-68. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.22.1.5468
Shoesmith, Eddie, G. E. Box, and N. R. Draper. "Empirical Model-Building and RESPONSE SURFACES." The Statistician 37, no. 1 (1988): 82. https://doi.org/10.2307/2348383
Edwards, Jeffrey R., and Mark E. Parry. "On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research." Academy of Management Journal 36, no. 6 (1993): 1577-1613. https://doi.org/10.2307/256822
Edwards, Jeffrey. "Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology." In Measuring Analyzing Behavior Organizations: Advances in Measurement and Data Analysis., pp. 350-400. Jossey-Bass Inc, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1037/e576892011-020
Tzagkarakis, George, Thomas Dionysopoulos, and Alin Achim. "Recurrence quantification analysis of denoised index returns via alpha-stable modeling of wavelet coefficients: detecting switching volatility regimes." Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics 20, no. 1 (2016): 75-96. https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2014-0102
Edwards, Jeffrey R. "The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 58, no. 1 (1994): 51-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1029
Harris, Michael M., Frederik Anseel, and Filip Lievens. "Keeping up with the Joneses: A field study of the relationships among upward, lateral, and downward comparisons and pay level satisfaction." Journal of Applied Psychology 93, no. 3 (2008): 665-673. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.665
Fleenor, John W., Cynthia D. McCauley, and Stephane Brutus. "Self-other rating agreement and leader effectiveness." The Leadership Quarterly 7, no. 4 (1996): 487-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90003-X
Atwater, Leanne, David Waldman, Cheri Ostroff, Chet Robie, and Karin M. Johnson. "Self-other agreement: Comparing its relationship with performance in the US and Europe." International Journal of Selection and Assessment 13, no. 1 (2005): 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0965-075X.2005.00297.x
Shanock, Linda Rhoades, Benjamin E. Baran, William A. Gentry, Stacy Clever Pattison, and Eric D. Heggestad. "Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores." Journal of Business and Psychology 25, no. 4 (2010): 543-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4
Kemik, Ömer F., Fahanwi A. Ngwabebhoh, and Ufuk Yildiz. "A response surface modelling study for sorption of Cu2+, Ni2+, Zn2+ and Cd2+ using chemically modified poly (vinylpyrrolidone) and poly (vinylpyrrolidone-co-methylacrylate) hydrogels." Adsorption Science & Technology 35, no. 3-4 (2017): 263-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263617416674950
Houtman, Irene, Marianne van Zwieten, Stavroula Leka, Aditya Jain, and Ernest de Vroome. "Social Dialogue and Psychosocial Risk Management: Added Value of Manager and Employee Representative Agreement in Risk Perception and Awareness." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 10 (2020): 3672. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103672
Humberg, Sarah, Steffen Nestler, and Mitja D. Back. "Response surface analysis in personality and social psychology: Checklist and clarifications for the case of congruence hypotheses." Social Psychological and Personality Science 10, no. 3 (2019): 409-419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618757600
Khuri, Andre I. "An overview of the use of generalized linear models in response surface methodology." Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 47, no. 3 (2001): 2023-2034. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-546X(01)00330-3
Cable, D., and J. R. Edwards. "The value of value congruence." Journal of Applied Psychology 94, no. 3 (2009): 654-677. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014891